Groups vs. Entity Filters: Quick Reference
This guide helps you understand when to use Groups versus Entity Filters for organizing your entities.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Groups | Entity Filters | Entity Filter Templates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Organize by client/family | Focus specific diagrams | Reusable entity selections |
| Scope | All entities for a client | Selected subset | Blueprint for entity filters |
| Entity Limit | Multiple groups per entity | Multiple entity filters per entity | N/A (applied on creation) |
| Visibility | All entities visible in group | Only selected entities visible | Not visible (templates only) |
| Creation | Settings > Groups | During diagram creation or from diagram | Save from diagram or create manually |
| Naming | You choose the name | You choose the name (or system-managed) | You choose the name |
| Impact | Affects all views and diagrams | Affects only one diagram | Affects new diagrams only |
New: Entity Filter Templates let you save entity selections as reusable blueprints for creating new diagrams.
Decision Tree
Need to organize entities?
│
├─ Different clients/families?
│ └─ Use: CREATE SEPARATE GROUPS
│ Example: "Smith Family" vs "Jones Family"
│
├─ Same client, different views?
│ └─ Use: CREATE FILTER GROUPS
│ Example: "Operating Entities" vs "Trust Structure"
│
├─ Entity shared across clients?
│ └─ Use: ASSIGN TO MULTIPLE GROUPS
│ Example: Shared company in multiple family structures
│
└─ Single comprehensive view?
└─ Use: ALL ENTITIES (no entity filter)
Example: Complete family tree
Real-World Examples
Example 1: Professional Advisor
Scenario: You're managing structures for 5 different client families.
Solution:
Groups:
├─ "Smith Family Trust Structure" (Group)
│ ├─ 30 entities
│ ├─ Diagram 1: "Full Structure" (All Entities)
│ └─ Diagram 2: "Operating Companies" (Entity Filter: 8 entities)
│
├─ "Jones Family Estate Plan" (Group)
│ ├─ 25 entities
│ ├─ Diagram 1: "Current Structure" (All Entities)
│ └─ Diagram 2: "Proposed Changes" (Entity Filter: 12 entities)
│
└─ "ABC Corp Subsidiaries" (Group)
├─ 40 entities
├─ Diagram 1: "Full Corporate Tree" (All Entities)
├─ Diagram 2: "Australian Entities" (Entity Filter: 15 entities)
└─ Diagram 3: "Overseas Holdings" (Entity Filter: 18 entities)
Why: Each client is completely separate (different groups), but you need multiple focused views within each client (entity filters).
Example 2: Corporate User
Scenario: You're mapping your company's subsidiary structure for different departments.
Solution:
Groups:
├─ "XYZ Corp Full Structure" (Group)
│ ├─ 60 entities (all subsidiaries, holdings, trusts)
│ ├─ Diagram 1: "Complete Org Chart" (All Entities)
│ ├─ Diagram 2: "Operating Companies Only" (Entity Filter: 20 entities)
│ ├─ Diagram 3: "Property Holdings" (Entity Filter: 15 entities)
│ ├─ Diagram 4: "IP Holdings" (Entity Filter: 8 entities)
│ └─ Diagram 5: "Board Presentation View" (Entity Filter: 12 entities)
Why: One corporate structure (one group), but different departments need different views (multiple entity filters).
Example 3: Estate Planning
Scenario: You're planning an estate transition with "before" and "after" views.
Solution:
"Wilson Family Estate" (Group)
├─ 35 entities total
├─ Diagram 1: "Current Structure" (Entity Filter: 20 entities - existing entities only)
├─ Diagram 2: "Proposed Structure" (Entity Filter: 25 entities - includes new entities)
└─ Diagram 3: "Transition Plan" (All Entities - shows both old and new)
Why: Same family (one group), but different time periods and planning scenarios (entity filters).
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Creating Groups Instead of Entity Filters
Wrong:
Groups:
├─ "Smith Family - Operating Entities"
├─ "Smith Family - Trusts"
└─ "Smith Family - Assets"
Right:
"Smith Family" (Group)
├─ Diagram: "Operating Entities" (Entity Filter)
├─ Diagram: "Trusts" (Entity Filter)
└─ Diagram: "Assets" (Entity Filter)
Why: Creating separate groups for the same family/client makes relationship management difficult and loses the connection between related entities.
Mistake 2: Not Using Entity Filters for Large Groups
Wrong:
"ABC Corp" (Group)
└─ Diagram: "All 60 Entities" (cluttered, hard to read)
Right:
"ABC Corp" (Group)
├─ Diagram 1: "Executive Overview" (Entity Filter: 12 key entities)
├─ Diagram 2: "Operating Companies" (Entity Filter: 20 entities)
└─ Diagram 3: "Full Structure" (All Entities - for reference)
Why: Filter groups make complex structures readable and focused.
Mistake 3: Not Grouping Entities
Wrong:
All Entities:
├─ Smith Family entities (ungrouped)
├─ Jones Family entities (ungrouped)
└─ ABC Corp entities (ungrouped)
Right:
Groups:
├─ "Smith Family"
├─ "Jones Family"
└─ "ABC Corp"
Why: Groups provide organization and context. Entities can belong to multiple groups if needed (e.g., shared holding company).
When to Use Each
Use Groups When:
✅ Starting a new client engagement
✅ Different families or corporate structures
✅ Separate legal entities
✅ Unrelated projects
✅ Need organizational separation
✅ Entity shared across multiple clients (assign to multiple groups)
Use Entity Filters When:
✅ Same client, different views
✅ Client presentations (show less detail)
✅ Large groups (30+ entities)
✅ Before/after comparisons
✅ Department-specific views
✅ Scenario planning
Use "All Entities" When:
✅ Initial structure mapping
✅ Comprehensive audit
✅ Small groups (< 15 entities)
✅ Exploring relationships
✅ Adding new entities
Migration Between Approaches
Converting Ungrouped Entities to a Group
- Navigate to Settings > Groups
- Create a new group
- Go to each ungrouped entity
- Edit and assign to the new group
Assigning Entities to Multiple Groups
When an entity (like a holding company) is relevant to multiple clients:
- Edit the entity
- In the group assignment section, select multiple groups
- Entity now appears in all selected groups
Splitting One Group into Multiple Groups
Caution: This may require reorganizing relationships.
- Create new groups
- Reassign entities to appropriate groups (entities can be in multiple groups)
- Verify relationships still make sense
- Optionally delete the old group if no longer needed
Better Alternative: Use entity filters instead of splitting, or use multi-group assignment.
Combining Multiple Groups into One
Warning: This loses group-level separation.
- Create a new group
- Assign entities from old groups to the new group (keep multi-group assignments if needed)
- Delete old groups if no longer needed
Better Alternative: Keep groups separate and assign shared entities to multiple groups.
Pro Tips
Tip 1: Name Groups Descriptively
Good:
- "Smith Family Trust Structure"
- "XYZ Corp Subsidiary Holdings"
- "Johnson Estate Planning 2026"
Bad:
- "Client 1"
- "Test Group"
- "Entities"
Tip 2: Use Entity Filters for Presentations
Create a "Presentation View" entity filter with:
- Key entities only
- Simplified relationships
- Clean, focused structure
Tip 3: Keep a "Master" Diagram
For each group, maintain:
- One "All Entities" diagram (complete view)
- Multiple focused entity filter diagrams (specific purposes)
Tip 4: Document Entity Filter Purpose
Use descriptive diagram and entity filter names:
- "Operating Companies - Current"
- "Trust Structure - Proposed 2026"
- "Asset Holdings - Property Only"
Tip 5: Use Multi-Group Assignment Strategically
Assign entities to multiple groups when:
- Shared holding companies
- Common trustees across families
- Entities involved in multiple client structures
Summary
Groups = Clients, Families, Projects (organize data, multi-group possible)
Entity Filters = Views, Filters, Presentations (focus data within diagrams)
All Entities = Comprehensive, Exploratory (see everything)
Choose based on:
- Organization needed: Groups (entities can be in multiple groups)
- Focus needed: Entity Filters